No Catfight?

So according to Howard Wolfson, there will be no cat-fight between Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin. Who the hell does he think he is, using sexist words like cat-fight? Exactly who is he trying to fool, and why?

I know Hillary Clinton billed herself as a fighter, but she's really much more of a sucker-puncher. She only fights those who can't, or won't defend themselves. Do we all remember how tough she was, as she cowered away from Steven Kluger's Vassar housemate, aka, Rick "look at my butt" Lazio? At this point in time, it is very awkward for a man and woman to go toe to toe, a point that Hillary Clinton used to her advantage, and it's the same point that Sarah Palin will be using to her advantage, if she's allowed...

I also know that there are those who say that the Clintons don't owe the Obamas anything. I say that the Democratic Party has been very, very good to the Clintons, to the detriment of itself, and the Clintons owe the Democratic Party a little something, something. Let's remember, it was democrats that prevented Bill Clinton from going to prison. He did commit perjury, people do go to jail for that. Bill Clinton, because of the democrats, was allowed to pay a fine. A fine he paid, by using money donated by a third party. Some of those democrats, lost their seats. The Democratic Party, lost control of the House and the Senate, all in an effort to protect and elevate the Clintons.

Now the Democratic Party wants to go to the White House, and the Clintons are being cutesy-wootsey. In a vulgar display of ingratitude, they are negotiating their roles. Using Howard Wolfson to plant sexist expressions, so that sexist expressions can be denounced!

You-who, Outrage, where are you?