I was nearly T-Boned last night. I was returning home on Duke Street, after a lovely evening that included sailing and Indian food. So what if I did some of the cooking, a good time, for a good cause, was had by all.
I'm stopped behind an SUV, and the light turned green, he proceeded through the intersection. But I noticed another SUV, who was about to make an illegal left turn, so I waited at the light. Had I proceeded per normal, he would have T-Boned me. As it was however, a police cruiser was only a few lanes to my right, had been traveling at a normal rate of speed. The cruiser had to take evasive action, turning a hard right, onto the sidewalk and hitting a pole, putting out the traffic light. The wrong SUV, stopped for a moment, the officer then got out of his cruiser. The SUV in the wrong, left. The officer shouted for him to stop, and gave him a little foot chase, but he was gone. I didn't get a plate number, so I left too. He'd already radioed for help, and I passed his back-up en route
I'm a defensive driver. But if I die in an "accident" I want somebody to have a tantrum.
Hillary Clinton was on Letterman last night. She isn't funny.
Friday, August 31, 2007
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Money, money, money
The Clinton camp is having money troubles, again. Yes, again. Do we remember Peter Paul? He's still suing them. He got some convictions against a Clinton employee. I know, just because the Clintons employ people who break the law, on behalf of the Clintons, doesn't reflect on them in the slightest. The Clintons have decided to give Mr. Hsu's contribution to charity, Donna Rice, check your mail. I know it seems like nothing, but considering how painful it is for any Clinton to part from a dime, anyone's dime, it's pretty fair. Besides, Hsu is still hosting a fund-raiser for Hillary next month. Are we finished talking about the creative bookkeeping practices that enabled a struggling family, whose only breadwinner brings home 47k per annum? How did that family contribute so much to the Clinton fund? And even more importantly, WHY?!? Personally, I could have mocked the Clintons no matter who laundered those funds. The fact those involved are of Asian decent, is a disapointment. When something is this easy, it removes much of the joy. I'll still do it, of course, but it won't be nearly as much fun.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
unions
So Hillary is picking up the support of the unions, relationship to the Penn the union buster is apparently not a problem. I’m wondering, as the unions have supported one Clinton or another for such a long time, and we cannot know about Hillary’s time in the White House until after the election, is there a connection? That is to say, even though we’re supposed to believe that Hillary did stuff while having an address in Washington, but we’re not to know of her accomplishments, if there were any. If there were accomplishments, I’m surprised that they aren’t touted. The Clintons often tout accomplishments. Granted usually they are other people’s accomplishments, but still…
The question I am asking, are there records of Hillary Clinton speaking to those who held sway with the union responsible for going out on strike, or whatever it was that enabled Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky to come into contact? I am asking if Hillary Clinton made arrangements for her husband to be in the situation that helped get him impeached. I do realize most rational people would not have gone through that, had they had a choice, but Hillary Clinton has frequently been obligated to publicly face her husband’s unfenced eye. She’s often punished un-established women. What if she was able to chose whom to put in front of her husband? She’d know his type. Hillary’s not shy about loading the deck, when was the last time you had a chocolate chip OATMEAL cookie? She would not be in the position she is now, had he not been impeached. Be angry all you like, it deserves an answer.
The question I am asking, are there records of Hillary Clinton speaking to those who held sway with the union responsible for going out on strike, or whatever it was that enabled Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky to come into contact? I am asking if Hillary Clinton made arrangements for her husband to be in the situation that helped get him impeached. I do realize most rational people would not have gone through that, had they had a choice, but Hillary Clinton has frequently been obligated to publicly face her husband’s unfenced eye. She’s often punished un-established women. What if she was able to chose whom to put in front of her husband? She’d know his type. Hillary’s not shy about loading the deck, when was the last time you had a chocolate chip OATMEAL cookie? She would not be in the position she is now, had he not been impeached. Be angry all you like, it deserves an answer.
Monday, August 27, 2007
Armstrong debate
Lance Armstrong is hosting a debate on cancer, that’s nice. Nicer still if he wears a jacket. Remember, the other option is all the candidates dressing in his gear…it was good to see Hillary wearing a shirt in Iowa. The men wear suits according to the color of the day, she doesn’t have to do that. She’s a girl.
Democratic candidates should go after Hillary Clinton, assuming that they would like a Democrat in the White House. Bill Maher said that he was for Hillary Clinton, but was sure that the Republicans would beat her. His reason was that the Republicans would come up with something, probably about Bill, and that would make her lose, but he added it wouldn’t be Hillary’s fault. I disagree. It will be Hillary’s fault. It will also be the fault of all the candidates who don’t go after her. We only know, what we know, and some of us have put it out of our minds. It’s so distasteful, why are we willing to go through all of that again?
Even if the Republicans don’t have anything, I know it’s unlikely, but go with me here, it’s possible with all of the early primaries, that the Clinton machine will shove Hillary down our collective throat, she’ll have the nomination in February, and do a public washing of their own laundry, by March we’ll be so saturated that we’ll believe them when we’re told that the news is old. When November rolls around, we’ll consider it a given, and therefore not important. Either way, we’d still have to hear it, still take part of those uncomfortable conversations. Ugg.
She’s easy to beat. All anybody has to do is make a little contact. That will bring out Wolfson, and his condescending tone “I can’t believe you’re not willing to live up to your own standards?!?”
You reply, “My candidate is running for president, not princess, there is no royal whiner in our campaign.”
Wolfson, in a painful expression, “Your so inexperienced, so naïve, it’s a travesty that you’re even in the race.”
You, “You’re candidate has been “fooled” by the president for 16 years. Eight of those years the president was her husband, of course he’s been “fooling” her for their entire marriage.”
Wolfson, “She wasn’t fooled, she handled it. What a shame it is that you brought that up.”
You, “You’re candidate’s experience is frontloaded on punishing women who’ve had her husband. This country does not want to go through another Impeachment of a Democratic president. That would surely break the back of this nation.”
Wolfson, “Whaaa, that was a low blow”
You, “So is cock-stopping those to whom you’re not married!
Right now, it looks as if the fix is in. If we Americans are not entitled to an honest race, at the very least, give us a decent show.
Democratic candidates should go after Hillary Clinton, assuming that they would like a Democrat in the White House. Bill Maher said that he was for Hillary Clinton, but was sure that the Republicans would beat her. His reason was that the Republicans would come up with something, probably about Bill, and that would make her lose, but he added it wouldn’t be Hillary’s fault. I disagree. It will be Hillary’s fault. It will also be the fault of all the candidates who don’t go after her. We only know, what we know, and some of us have put it out of our minds. It’s so distasteful, why are we willing to go through all of that again?
Even if the Republicans don’t have anything, I know it’s unlikely, but go with me here, it’s possible with all of the early primaries, that the Clinton machine will shove Hillary down our collective throat, she’ll have the nomination in February, and do a public washing of their own laundry, by March we’ll be so saturated that we’ll believe them when we’re told that the news is old. When November rolls around, we’ll consider it a given, and therefore not important. Either way, we’d still have to hear it, still take part of those uncomfortable conversations. Ugg.
She’s easy to beat. All anybody has to do is make a little contact. That will bring out Wolfson, and his condescending tone “I can’t believe you’re not willing to live up to your own standards?!?”
You reply, “My candidate is running for president, not princess, there is no royal whiner in our campaign.”
Wolfson, in a painful expression, “Your so inexperienced, so naïve, it’s a travesty that you’re even in the race.”
You, “You’re candidate has been “fooled” by the president for 16 years. Eight of those years the president was her husband, of course he’s been “fooling” her for their entire marriage.”
Wolfson, “She wasn’t fooled, she handled it. What a shame it is that you brought that up.”
You, “You’re candidate’s experience is frontloaded on punishing women who’ve had her husband. This country does not want to go through another Impeachment of a Democratic president. That would surely break the back of this nation.”
Wolfson, “Whaaa, that was a low blow”
You, “So is cock-stopping those to whom you’re not married!
Right now, it looks as if the fix is in. If we Americans are not entitled to an honest race, at the very least, give us a decent show.
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Swipe at Hilary?
Did Michelle Obama take a swipe at Hillary Clinton? Some say yes, others say no. I say, if it wasn't a swipe, it should have been. If we as a nation return the Clintons to the White House, all of their baggage also returns. We need to know that, we need to own it. It will be our own damn fault. Bill Clinton has been screwing around on his wife since before they married. It's one thing when a president screws around, is it a different thing when a president is screwed around upon? It's worth some thought. Hillary Clinton is not an innocent. She brutalized her husband's girlfriends, and everybody, including feminists let her do it. Often, she was aided in this endeavor. What happens when Bill chooses a women who has a little weight of her own? What international problems would that create? Bill Clinton could have gotten out of being impeached, he brought that onto the nation himself. All he had to do was settle a case, a case that he did settle. He chose instead to make his shortcomings the problem of the nation. Now the Clintons want the nation to be responsible again for their conduct. We need to consider their conduct, and decide if that weight is worth us bearing.
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Scoldings
I scolded Hillary just now. Sent emails to her campaign, complaining about her disloyalty to somebody we both know. As her website would not accept emails from my personal account, I tried twice, I sent it from this account. It went through, without restarting, so I snitched her out about screwing with my emails to her campaign.
I don't care how arrogant it is, I'd like to upgrade my enemies please.
I don't care how arrogant it is, I'd like to upgrade my enemies please.
Trades?
So Warren Buffet is bargain shopping...good thing those French banks made that so easy, not that Steven Kluger had anything to do with that of course...
It does make more sense than the sex industry people rallying around the least sexual candidate running for president, unless they're just courting her husband's patronage...
It does make more sense than the sex industry people rallying around the least sexual candidate running for president, unless they're just courting her husband's patronage...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)